AccueilCovid-19Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee – 6/10/2021

Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee – 6/10/2021

Vous êtes vaccinés?, vous avez suivi la propagande!

Voici une preuve que le vaccin n’est pas la solution car en Inde les 3,5% des doublement vaccinés ont été atteint du Covid, ni nécessaire, qu’il y a une médication qui fonctionne l’Ivermectine, l’Inde le prouve avec une maîtrise totale de la « pandémie » par l’Ivermectine.C’est pas moi qui le dis   …..Étude indienne en PJ.

Vous êtes vacciné Pfizer, vous serez huit fois plus affectés par le variant sud-africain que les non-vaccinés.

C’est pas moi qui le dis….Étude Israélienne en PJ.

A votre santé! 

marco pietteur 

yahoo report on lawsuit against WHO https://in.news.yahoo.com/indian-bar-association-vs-chief-091221375.html
The COVID crisis in India that appeared in April and May appears to be under control now, as the cases in June have dropped down to levels before their second surge.  From https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/country/india/ :

But this decline in cases is not due to vaccinations, as only 3.4% of India’s  population has been fully vaccinated, according to data on June 14, 2021 from https://ourworldindata.org/covid-vaccinations  (India began vaccinations in mid January 2021.  Also interesting to note that other Asian countries vaccinate rates are so low that they don’t even appear on the chart below – e.g. China, Japan, S. Korea, etc. are not even on the chart)  

 The shots did not appear to be effective in protection from dying of COVID, as NEARLY one-third of patients who died of coronavirus after catching the Indian ‘Delta’ variant had received BOTH Covid jabs(June 13) https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/15260747/third-patients-died-indian-delta-variant-both-jabs/ [Note: Only 3.4% of the country is fully vaccinated, yet this 3.4% comprises almost 30% of all COVID deaths – clearly something is wrong – the shots are somehow increasing deaths.  Also this study from Tel Aviv University found that a South African variant of the virus affects people vaccinated with the Pfizer shot 8 times more than unvaccinated people.   https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.04.06.21254882v121254882v1  ]  alternate source for india lawsuit https://in.news.yahoo.com/indian-bar-association-vs-chief-091221375.html

1) NEARLY one-third of patients who died of coronavirus after catching the Indian ‘Delta’ variant had received BOTH Covid jabs (June 13) https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/15260747/third-patients-died-indian-delta-variant-both-jabs/

2) Two-dose ivermectin prophylaxis at a dose of 300 μg/kg with a gap of 72 hours was associated with a 73% reduction of SARS-CoV-2 infection among healthcare workers in India for the following month.  https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33592050/

3) India saw a dramatic fall in cases after the ICMR and AIIMS added Ivermectin to their protocols on April 20, 2021. Daily COVID-19 cases, which peaked at 414,188, are now down to 84,332, representing a drop of 80% overall in the country of India. The COVID crisis at the end of April has now been brought under control, not with mass vaccination, but instead with an inexpensive repurposed drug, Ivermectin. Those Indian states that adopted more aggressive Ivermectin policies saw their cases fall far more than 80%, states like Uttar Pradesh – down 98% [37,944 to 596], like Uttarakhand – down 97% [9642 to 287] and Goa – down 90% [4195 to 423]. Delhi saw a 99% drop [28,395 to 238].  Tamil Nadu, which publicly banned Ivermectin, saw their cases rise to the highest in India, and they continued setting state records until May 21, 2021, when they peaked at 36,184.  https://www.thedesertreview.com/opinion/letters_to_editor/ivermectin-saves-india/article_14b1f1d6-cd2f-11eb-8b78-9710d864f627.html

97% drop in Delhi cases https://www.thedesertreview.com/news/national/ivermectin-obliterates-97-percent-of-delhi-cases/article_6a3be6b2-c31f-11eb-836d-2722d2325a08.html

4) June 7, Indian Bar Association sues WHO scientist over Ivermectin

The Indian Bar Association (IBA) sued WHO Chief Scientist Dr. Soumya Swaminathan on May 25, accusing her in a 71-point brief of causing the deaths of Indian citizens by misleading them about Ivermectin. 

  The entire world witnessed the effectiveness of Ivermectin against India’s deadly second surge as the locations that adopted it saw their outbreaks quickly extinguished in stark contrast to those states that did not. In Ivermectin areas of Delhi, Uttar Pradesh, Uttarakhand, and Goa, cases dropped 98%, 97%, 94%, and 86%, respectively. By contrast, Tamil Nadu opted out of Ivermectin. As a result, their cases skyrocketed and rose to the highest in India, with deaths increasing ten-fold.

Point 56 states, “That your misleading tweet on May 10, 2021, against the use of Ivermectin had the effect of the State of Tamil Nadu withdrawing Ivermectin from the protocol on May 11, 2021, just a day after the Tamil Nadu government had indicated the same for the treatment of COVID-19 patients.”  https://science.thewire.in/health/tn-revises-protocols-leaves-out-Ivermectin-for-covid-patients/ 

Advocate Dipali Ojha, lead attorney for the Indian Bar Association, threatened criminal prosecution against Dr.  Swaminathan “for each death” caused by her acts of commission and omission. The brief accused Swaminathan of misconduct by using her position as a health authority to further the agenda of special interests to maintain an EUA for the lucrative vaccine industry.  https://indianbarassociation.in/press-releases/

Specific charges included the running of a disinformation campaign against Ivermectin and issuing statements in social and mainstream media to wrongfully influence the public against the use of Ivermectin despite the existence of large amounts of clinical data showing its profound effectiveness in both prevention and treatment of COVID-19.

In particular, the Indian Bar brief referenced the peer-reviewed publications and evidence compiled by the ten-member Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance (FLCCC) group and the 65-member British Ivermectin Recommendation Development (BIRD) panel headed by WHO consultant and meta-analysis expert Dr. Tess Lawrie.

The brief cited US Attorney Ralph C. Lorigo’s hospital cases in New York where court orders were required for dying COVID patients to receive the Ivermectin. In multiple instances of such comatose patients, following the court-ordered Ivermectin, the patients recovered. In addition, the Indian Bar Association cited previous articles published in this forum, The Desert Review

Advocate Ojha accused the WHO and Dr. Swaminathan in Points 60 and 61 as having misled and misguided the Indian people throughout the pandemic from mask wear to exonerating China as to the virus’s origins.

“The world is gradually waking up to your absurd, arbitrary and fallacious approach in presenting concocted facts as ‘scientific approach.’ While the WHO flaunts itself like a ‘know it all,’ it is akin to the vain Emperor in new clothes while the entire world has realized by now, the Emperor has no clothes at all.”

The brief accused the WHO of being complicit in a vast disinformation campaign. Point 61 states, “The FLCCC and the BIRD have shown exemplary courage in building a formidable force to tackle the challenge of disinformation, resistance, and rebuke from pharma lobbies and powerful health interests like WHO, NIH, CDC, and regulators like the US FDA.”

Point 52 reads,  “It seems you have deliberately opted for deaths of people to achieve your ulterior goals, and this is sufficient grounds for criminal prosecution against you.”

« The Indian Bar Association has warned action under section 302 etc. of the Indian Penal Code against Dr. Soumya Swaminathan and others, for murder of each person dying due to obstruction in treatment of COVID-19 patient effectively by Ivermectin. Punishment under section 302 of the Indian Penal Code is death penalty or life imprisonment. »https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/covid-vaccine-spike-protein-travels-from-injection-site-organ-damage/Research obtained by a group of scientists shows the COVID vaccine spike protein can travel from the injection site and accumulate in organs and tissues including the spleen, bone marrow, the liver, adrenal glands and in “quite high concentrations” in the ovaries.

COVID vaccine researchers had previously assumed mRNA COVID vaccines would behave like traditional vaccines and that the vaccine’s spike protein would remain mostly in the injection site at the shoulder muscle or local lymph nodes.  But new research by Pfizer contradicts that theory.

We made a big mistake. We didn’t realize it until now,” said Byram Bridle, a viral immunologist and associate professor at University of Guelph, Ontario. “We thought the spike protein was a great target antigen, we never knew the spike protein itself was a toxin and was a pathogenic protein. So by vaccinating people we are inadvertently inoculating them with a toxin.”

“However, when studying the severe COVID-19, […] heart problems, lots of problems with the cardiovascular system, bleeding and clotting, are all associated with COVID-19,” he added. “In doing that research, what has been discovered by the scientific community, the spike protein on its own is almost entirely responsible for the damage to the cardiovascular system, if it gets into circulation.”

When the purified spike protein is injected into the blood of research animals, they experience damage to the cardiovascular system and the protein can cross the blood-brain barrier and cause damage to the brain, Bridle explained.  Pfizer’s biodistribution study shows the COVID spike protein gets into the blood where it circulates for several days post-vaccination and then accumulates in organs and tissues including the spleen, bone marrow, the liver, adrenal glands and in “quite high concentrations” in the ovaries.

In a study published in Nature Neuroscience, lab animals injected with purified spike protein into their bloodstream developed cardiovascular problems. The spike protein also crossed the blood-brain barrier and caused damage to the brain.

“Now, we have clear-cut evidence that the vaccines that make the cells in our deltoid muscles manufacture this protein — that the vaccine itself, plus the protein — gets into blood circulation,” he said.

Once in circulation, the spike protein can attach to specific ACE2 receptors that are on blood platelets and the cells that line blood vessels, Bridle said. “When that happens it can do one of two things. It can either cause platelets to clump, and that can lead to clotting — that’s exactly why we’ve been seeing clotting disorders associated with these vaccines. It can also lead to bleeding,” he added.

Both clotting and bleeding are associated with vaccine-induced thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT). Bridle also said the spike protein in circulation would explain recently reported heart problems in vaccinated teens.

Stephanie Seneff, senior research scientists at Massachusetts Institute of Technology, said it is now clear vaccine content is being delivered to the spleen and the glands, including the ovaries and the adrenal glands, and is being shed into the medium and then eventually reaches the bloodstream causing systemic damage.

“ACE2 receptors are common in the heart and brain,” she added. “And this is how the spike protein causes cardiovascular and cognitive problems.”

Dr. J. Patrick Whelan, a pediatric rheumatologist, warned the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in December mRNA vaccines could cause microvascular injury to the brain, heart, liver and kidneys in ways not assessed in safety trials in his public submission.  Subject: Another Citizens petition against shots, by BMJ editor Doshi and Baylor U Vice Chief of Med. McCullough. Heart inflammation from shots up to 40X higher than normal
To: 

1) On June 1, 27 prominent scientists and doctors, including Dr. PeterMcCullough and Dr. Peter Doshi, Senior Editor of the BMJ (British Medical Journal), filed a citizen’s petition to the FDA demanding the FDA withhold full approval of COVID vaccines until efficacy and safety measures are met. The petition can be found here https://downloads.regulations.gov/FDA-2021-P-0521-0001/attachment_1.pdf  – highly recommend reading this petition to learn more about the safety concerns of this shot and the spike protein.  An article about this petition27 Experts Launch Citizen Petition Demanding FDA ‘Slow Down and Get the Science Right’ Before Approving COVID Vaccines • Children’s Health Defense (childrenshealthdefense.org)[Dr. Peter McCullough, MD, MPH is pro-vaccine (he has had all vaccines) and Vice Chief of Medicine at Baylor University Medical Center, treated patients with COVID and wrote 35 peer-reviewed papers on COVID (most of them can be found here Peter Mccullough Covid – Search Results – PubMed (nih.gov)).   He is an advocate of early treatment for COVID-19.  He’s the top cardiorenal expert in the U.S., possibly the world, and has written over 600 papers prior to COVID, which can be found here Peter mccullough – Search Results – PubMed (nih.gov) ]
For Kids, Benefits of COVID Vaccine ‘Don’t Outweigh Risks,’ Experts Tell FDA • Children’s Health Defense (childrenshealthdefense.org)Kim Witczak, an FDA consumer representative, and Peter Doshi, Ph,D, associate professor University of Maryland School of Pharmacy and senior editor of The BMJ, were two of 27 researchers and clinicians around the world who launched a citizen’s petition demanding the FDA withhold full approval of COVID vaccines until efficacy and safety measures are met.  Doshi said during the open public hearing session, there is no emergency that would warrant using EUA to authorize COVID vaccines for children.  Doshi said “the reported 100% efficacy in Pfizer’s trial was based on 16 COVID cases in the placebo group versus none in the fully vaccinated group. But there were about 1,000 placebo recipients so just 2% got COVID. Put another way, 2% of the fully vaccinated avoided COVID, whereas 98% of the vaccinated wouldn’t have gotten COVID anyway. “  As for long-term side-effects, Doshi said many severe side effects occur beyond six weeks after dosing, specifically referencing a quote by top FDA advisor Dr. Paul Offit who stated otherwise.

Vaccinating children for the benefit of adults is an “unproven hypothetical benefit,” Doshi said. He reminded the FDA they cannot authorize or approve a medical product in a population unless the benefits outweigh the risks in that same population.

“If the FDA does not have a high bar for EUAs and licensing, the point of regulation is lost,” Doshi said.
2) Nearly 800 reports of heart inflammation reported following the mRNA shots, and a higher than expected incidence reported in 16-24 year olds.  In 16- and 17- year olds, the number of myocarditis reported following Pfizer shots is at 4 to 40 times higher than normal, and for young adults between ages of 18 and 24, the myocarditis reported following Pfizer shots is 2-24 times higher than normal.  Also, realize that since VAERS is a passive reporting system (i.e patients, doctors, or family members would submit reports if they are inclined to do so and if they feel that the adverse event may have been due to vaccination) and not an automatic system that reports adverse events in every person who receives a shot, that the actual incidents of myocarditis are probably higher than what’s been reported to VAERS.  [Harvard Pilgrim Healthcare, Inc, reported that fewer than 1% of vaccine adverse events are reported to VAERSElectronic Support for Public Health–Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (ESP:VAERS) (ahrq.gov) ] https://www.theepochtimes.com/nearly-800-reports-of-heart-inflammation-after-covid-19-vaccination-in-us_3853032.html

  • The Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, said in a little-noticed update published on June 1 that data from VAERS showed that in the 30 days following the second dose of mRNA vaccinations, “there was a higher number of observed than expected myocarditis/pericarditis cases in 16–24-year-olds.”
  • Israel’s Health Ministry said that same day that it found 275 cases of heart inflammation among the more than 5 million people in the country who received a vaccine between December 2020 and May. An Israeli study found “a probable link” between receiving the second dose of the Pfizer jab “and the appearance of myocarditis among men aged 16 to 30,” the ministry said.
  • A case report examining myocarditis in seven adolescents following vaccination with Pfizer’s jab, published in Pediatrics, the journal of the American Academy of Pediatrics, this month, said all seven developed the inflammation within 4 days of receiving the second dose, did not have evidence of COVID-19 infection, and did not meet the criteria for MIS-C, a rare disease. The seven males, between the ages of 14 and 19, all required hospital care but each was eventually discharged. 
  • The expected number of myocarditis/pericarditis cases in those aged 16 or 17, based on background incidence rates and the number of doses administered to that population through May 31, is between two and 19. But based on the VAERS reports, the number is 79.
  • Likewise, the expected number for cases among young adults between the ages of 18 and 24 is eight to 83. The number reported in VAERS is 196.

Tucker Carlson reported on this also Tucker Carlson: ‘Healthy Young People More Likely to Be Harmed by Vaccine, Than by COVID’ • Children’s Health Defense (childrenshealthdefense.org)

NATURAMedicatrix

Restez connecté

53,654FansLike
42,789SubscribersSubscribe

Articles populaires

Votre livre "Programme Nutritionnel" de docteur Jacob GRATUIT :)

Nouvelle approche nutritionnelle selon le docteur JACOB, télécharger-le en version numérique gratuitement, sur votre boîte email.

Vous venez de recevoir une confirmation par email. Vérifiez que vous l'avez bien reçue :) Vérifiez bien votre dossier "spam" avant de nous contacter... les filtres anti-spams sont parfois un peu trop sensibles ! ;)